Who Holds Risk? Responsibility, Lending, and the Future of Psychedelic Care
In psychedelic finance, risk is frequently assigned to facilitators and treated as an individual failing rather than a systemic condition. This essay reframes responsibility as shared, exploring how care-centered lending can create stability, reduce burnout, and support the long-term integrity of psychedelic care.
What Regulation Can’t Do: Why Psychedelic Care Needs Independent Infrastructure
Regulation is a necessary starting point for psychedelic care, but it does not provide the financial, relational, or material support facilitators need to endure. This essay examines why independent infrastructure must follow policy if psychedelic care is to remain ethical, inclusive, and sustainable over time.
The Access Problem: Financing the Future of Psychedelic Facilitation
Access has always shaped who can practice psychedelic facilitation, and who cannot. This essay examines how traditional finance excludes facilitators and why redesigning capital access is essential for equity, dignity, and the future of psychedelic care.